<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Peterism &#187; apple</title>
	<atom:link href="http://peterchuang.com/blog/tag/apple/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://peterchuang.com/blog</link>
	<description>NOT just random thoughts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 23:15:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Reuters: Apple fires back at Nokia in patents battle</title>
		<link>http://peterchuang.com/blog/2009/12/357/</link>
		<comments>http://peterchuang.com/blog/2009/12/357/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 21:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nokia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peterchuang.com/blog/2009/12/357/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a target="_blank" href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE5BA2DO20091214">Story</a> from Reuters on the counter-suit by Apple against Nokia on various patents related to handsets.</p>
<p><a target="_blank" href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE5BA2DO20091214">http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE5BA2DO20091214</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://peterchuang.com/blog/2009/12/357/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple&#8217;s Undeserved Claim to Multi-Touch Patents</title>
		<link>http://peterchuang.com/blog/2009/03/177/</link>
		<comments>http://peterchuang.com/blog/2009/03/177/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 07:46:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multi-touch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peterchuang.com/blog/?p=177</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[iPhone and iPod Touch's multi-touch is great and quite fun to work with, but it is not and should not be exclusive to Apple.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First off, don&#8217;t get me wrong.  I don&#8217;t hate Apple.  They do have the ability to get well-designed products out and do it quick.  Their marketing guys are geniuses, in ways that lure unsuspecting tech junkies into faithful worshipers.  On January 20, 2009, as CNet reported in <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13579_3-10150436-37.html">this article</a>, Apple was awarded several patents related to its multi-touch technology as implemented on its iPhone and iPod Touch.  The same article points out that Apple&#8217;s COO Tim Cook said Apple &#8220;will not stand for having our (intellectual property) ripped off, and we&#8217;ll use whatever weapons that we have at our disposal.&#8221;</p>
<p>This development reminds me of Amazon&#8217;s ill-conceived &#8220;One-Click&#8221; patent in the late 90&#8242;s that was subsequently criticized by many, including the EFF, who then called for a boycott against the online retailer.  The fact that the USPTO awarded Apple these patents is troubling.  Apple is trying to stifle competition by scaring others into NOT implementing &#8220;concepts&#8221;.  I am not a patent attorney (yet), but it appears to me that the US legal system has been abused again, and is at least partially responsible for Google&#8217;s decision not to implement multi-touch in their G1.</p>
<p>As pointed on in <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5142445/dissecting-apples-multitouch-patent-can-it-stop-palm">this article from Gizmodo</a>, I don&#8217;t think Apple will have a rightful and lasting hold onto those patents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://peterchuang.com/blog/2009/03/177/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
